A Million Little Pieces and What it Means for Writers

I’m not a person who watches Oprah on a regular basis, but I’m sitting here right now, watching James Frey squirm as Oprah grills him on the veracity of his book, which I just finished reading.

I’m still sorting through what I thought of the book overall. I read The Smoking Gun report long before I started reading the book, so while I never felt duped, it was definitely irritating to have to question what was real and what was not in the book.

I’m also thinking about this from the perspective of a nonfiction writer.

To a certain extent, any person who writes about themselves turns "I" into a character, and all the real people in their lives into characters as well. It’s generally accepted that you can’t fit all the truth about a person into even the longest narrative, and that you will naturally exaggerate (or as we like to say, emphasize) some moments as opposed to others, some characteristics as opposed to others. Obviously, there’s a very big difference between what amounts to shading, and wholesale alteration and fabrication, which Frey has just admitted to Oprah (with a spooky lack of affect) that he’s done in his memoir. Eighty-seven days in jail is just the same as three hours? Death by hanging the same as slitting wrists? Root canal without Novocaine the same as root canal with? Please.

There will doubtless be lots of discussion about whether this incident is another Jayson Blair, Stephen Glass, hurt the institution of journalism and particularly narrative nonfiction moment. I don’t think it is, and I’m looking at the reason why. Oprah, our cultural queen, is telling people that the truth matters, and that wholesale alteration and fabrication is very very bad and even makes her even cry. She is also exposing the lack of fact-checking in the book publishing world, which I think would shock most readers.

When I’ve had (or read online) discussion of this book by non-writers, the general tone has been, who the hell  cares if he made up a bunch of stuff if it’s a good read? My bet is that now that Oprah is on the side of stricter scruples in memoir, that attitude will change. And that will be good for all nonfiction writers.


2 thoughts on “A Million Little Pieces and What it Means for Writers

  1. Doesn’t it seem like a lot of these “oh my god, my childhood was so hard and I was abused, did I mention the abuse, it was terrible, poor me” books turn out to be fake? The only one I can think of right now is JT LeRoy, but I feel like there have been others. Of course, there’s also the whole fake-Vietnam-war-experience genre. I wonder if there are certain things that people are particularly likely to lie about in such a very public and elaborate way? And if so, why those things and not others?

  2. That’s interesting. Have there been any fake, I was a Nazi concentration camp gaurd memoirs, or trumped up memoirs of people who are entirely unsympathetic? Maybe this is part of the recovery culture which glorifies vicitimhood– which, if it’s not the case in the wider world, is definitely the case among writers, who are perhaps the only group known to bemoan their happy childhoods for the lack of material it provided them.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s